Fair Hiring and Advancement

Connect learning to your work

A practical place
to begin.

Make the basis of a people decision easier to examine

Hiring and advancement discussions can become inconsistent when different reviewers rely on different pictures of what good performance looks like. This program explores how to define relevant criteria, gather comparable evidence and discuss conclusions with greater clarity. It is intended to support a thoughtful process around decisions that remain the responsibility of authorized people in the organization.

Start with the work the role requires. Translate broad qualities into observable capabilities and distinguish an essential requirement from a preference inherited from a previous role holder. Consider how a person could demonstrate the capability through different experiences. Familiarity with one career path should not substitute for examining evidence relevant to the actual responsibility.

Compare evidence rather than impressions

In an illustrative exercise, two candidates describe leading a project in very different settings. One uses familiar terminology; the other explains a less recognizable environment. Practice asking comparable questions about the goal, the person's actions and the result. Record the evidence separately from the overall impression so the discussion can return to what was actually learned.

Explore how to notice a gap without filling it with an assumption. A follow-up question, a work-related exercise or another appropriate source of evidence may be needed. Avoid treating confidence, similarity or a polished presentation as proof of every capability required for the role.

Discuss the reasoning consistently

Practice reviewing evidence against the agreed criteria before combining individual conclusions. Identify where reviewers disagree and whether the disagreement concerns the evidence, its interpretation or the importance of a criterion. Keep the account specific enough that an authorized reviewer can understand how the conclusion was reached and which uncertainties remain.

Review a step in your existing process

Bring a fictionalized role description or a general process question rather than identifiable applicant information. Choose one improvement, such as clearer criteria or more consistent notes, and consider how it fits your organization's hiring and advancement procedures. This is professional development about decision practices; it does not make employment decisions, provide jurisdiction-specific legal advice or replace HR review and applicable organizational requirements.

Practices to develop

• Translate a role requirement into an observable capability and identify appropriate ways that different experiences might demonstrate it.
• Record comparable work-related evidence while keeping an overall impression separate from the account of what was learned.
• Discuss a difference between reviewers by identifying whether it concerns evidence, interpretation or the importance of an agreed criterion.

Topics to explore

Your learning focus.

Start where you are

Who it’s for.

Managers involved in hiring, development and advancement

Bring a workplace situation you want to approach differently. We can discuss your experience, priorities and the support that would be useful before agreeing on delivery.

Learning that fits your context

Explore your online options.

Ask about live online, self-paced or blended online learning. The available approach, content scope and schedule are agreed for your request.

Select a preference and optional participant count in your training request. You can also leave both open for discussion.